This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Maxwellt, E. K. Articles by Maxwell, R. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Search and Research in Ethnology: Continuous Comparative Analysis1

Robert J. Maxwell

This article presents continuous comparative analysis as a research method suitable for examining data cross-culturally. We describe com paring as a universal cognitive process, basic to all sociological and an thropological endeavors. We present the comparative process in cross- cultural research and suggest that differences in anthropological research strategies appear for two reasons: First, some researchers are prepared to test hypotheses across cultures, while others believe that such tests are premature and are satisfied at this stage to develop plausible theories of human nature. To test hypotheses, researchers must concern themselves with the comparability of their population units. To generate hypotheses, investigators question each other about the comparability of their analytic units. Second, research goals require varying balance between stages of induction and deduction and vary in how long the process of alternating between induction and deduction may be maintained. Continuous com parative analysis is a suitable method for cross-cultural research because it enables us to continue the comparative process basic to our discipline throughout the research task.

Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, 219-243 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/106939718001500303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?