Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cross-Cultural Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dow, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Saving the Theory: On Chi-Square Tests With Cross-Cultural Survey Data

Malcolm M. Dow

Northwestern University

Using data from three well-known cross-cultural survey data sets that differ in size and geographical scope, this article examines the effects of spatial and/or cultural clustering of societies on the usual chi-square test of independence. Sample design effects for individ ual variables and for two-way contingency tables from all three data sets were found to be generally larger than unity, often consid erably so, suggesting that the associated chi-square test statistic var iances are considerably underestimated and that the risk of Type I errors is considerably greater than the 5% level usually assumed by researchers. This is especially true if variable categories have been collapsed to overcome small cell counts, a common occurrence in comparative research. These empirical findings imply that using chi-square tests with categorical variables from cross-cultural sur vey data sets is a relatively easy way to generate an excess of sta tistically significant results, thus increasing the likelihood of "sav ing the theory." The results also strongly suggest that the extensive reporting of naive chi-square independence tests using cross- cultural data sets over the past several decades has led to incorrect rejection of null hypotheses at levels much higher than the expected 5% rate. A reanalysis of chi-square-based inferences from a pre viously published study also supports this conclusion. A deflation factor is proposed for observed chi-squares that reduces the Type I error rates closer to the assumed levels.

Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 27, No. 3-4, 247-276 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/106939719302700305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?