This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1069397108319596v1 42/3/270    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Betzig, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hunting Kings

The Adaptationist Program

Nimrod, the builder of cities from Babel to Calah, was the first "mighty man" on earth, a "mighty hunter before the Lord." So were other Near Eastern, North African, Far Eastern, European, and New World kings. They hunted everything from lions to guanacos, on four of six continents, from the beginning to the end of recorded time. But why? Hunting provided meat, and perhaps military exercise; but most kings subsisted on domesticated animals and plants, and delegated their wars to specialists. Besides, chasing animals cost money and time, and more than a few kings were killed or maimed in the act of bringing down game. The costs seem to outweigh the benefits. Much about human history seems to have been adaptive. Royal hunts do not. Hunting was the human adaptation on the savannah for hundreds of thousands of years. But it seems to be a vestige most kings can't shake.

Key Words: hunting • foraging • evolutionary psychology • human evolution

This version was published on August 1, 2008

Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, 270-289 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1069397108319596


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?