This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1069397108320422v1 42/4/319    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boehm, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Purposive Social Selection and the Evolution of Human Altruism

Department of Anthropology

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cboehm1{at}msn.com.

	Abstract

Normally scientific evolutionary approaches eschew any element of teleology in theorizing about how natural selection processes work, but social decisions pose a problem for this position. This article examines both positive and negative social sanctioning by human groups to show that purposive social selection at the level of phenotype can have parallel effects at the level of genotype, and that social control has shaped human genetic nature profoundly. A small cross-cultural sample of Pleistocene-appropriate foragers is used to suggest that human groups have been favoring generous individuals, for at least 45,000 years, in ways that affect their fitness. The impact on gene pools could have been substantial, given that runaway selection is likely to have been involved. This type of explanation, which takes human purposes into account as part of evolutionary process, offers a new solution for the genetic paradox of altruistic behavior.

First published on July 11, 2008, doi:10.1177/1069397108320422

Cross-Cultural Research 2008;42:319.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?